top of page


The role of independent facilitation in agricultural programs.
Agricultural programs work best when people feel clear about where they are heading, connected to the purpose of the work, and confident that their contribution matters. Across this series, I have explored many of the ingredients that help programs succeed — good design, shared ownership, strong governance, adult learning, engagement continuous improvement and communication. There is one element that often helps bring all of these pieces together: effective, independent facil
susie915
5 days ago4 min read


The power of communication in program delivery.
Strong communication is one of those things that can make or break an agricultural program, but it is often underestimated. Strategy, planning, governance, engagement, capability building, codesign and evaluation are all important elements, but communication is the thread that holds all of that together. Almost always, when frustrations build and there is disconnect between people, it's a direct result of poor communication. When communication is clear, consistent and purpose
susie915
Oct 194 min read


Evaluation - the tool to ensure programs are relevant, responsive and effective.
Evaluation is one of those terms that is sometimes considered a tick-box exercise to meet funding requirements and can be seen as another layer of paperwork to fulfil. However, strong evaluation can be a tool that makes a massive difference to the success of a program. Effective programs respond to what is happening around them, learn from the people involved and improve as they go. Programs with built-in evaluation support continuous improvement, along with flexibility and a
susie915
Oct 125 min read


Why effective engagement matters
Engagement is one of the most important parts of any successful agricultural program. When growers, industry partners, researchers and other stakeholders are genuinely involved, programs build momentum, adoption improves and the outcomes are stronger. When engagement is weak or patchy, even a well-designed initiative can struggle to gain traction. At its core, effective engagement is about connection, trust, relevance and shared purpose. If we want programs to make a real and
susie915
Oct 64 min read


Building capability by designing learning for real people
Agriculture in Australia is underpinned by its people, who are on the whole incredibly talented, innovative, creative and resilient. They also have to have skills across many different functions and be adaptable to change. Continually building on that capability is one of the most powerful ways we can strengthen the sector. When growers, industry professionals and regional community members build new skills, confidence and understanding, the whole sector becomes more resilien
susie915
Sep 286 min read


Governance that enables: practical tools for regional not-for-profit and community organisations.
The term governance is often misunderstood in not-for-profit, industry and community organisations. It can sound like compliance, paperwork, or a set of rules that slows down volunteers, committees and staff who are simply trying to get the work done. When people are already stretched, governance can seem like one more thing to manage. But good governance is not about making things harder. When it is done well, governance is a practical support system. It helps people make so
susie915
Sep 215 min read


Maintaining focus and efficiency of programs while navigating bureaucracy
Bureaucracy is often something we have to navigate in delivery of agricultural programs, particularly when there are multiple funding bodies, including governments, universities, levy funds and private investment. Each funding body may have its own reporting and compliance requirements that also have to fit within an overarching governance arrangement. This can make project management, expectations, timelines, evaluation, reporting and accountability complex and time consumin
susie915
Sep 156 min read


Why strong agricultural programs should start with people
Agriculture and regional communities have always been built on people and relationships. When developing agricultural programs, we can have a sound template, a neat logic framework and a beautifully formatted plan, but if the people who are meant to benefit from the work do not feel connected to it, the plan will struggle. People are far more likely to back something when they believe in it, understand it and trust the way it has been developed. Shared ownership is not just a
susie915
Sep 74 min read


Co-design that works: building programs with people, not just for them.
Co‑design is one of those buzz words that is popping up everywhere. In agriculture, government, community programs, and funding conversations - and mostly with good intent. But sometimes when organisations say co‑design, what is really meant is consultation or feedback, not genuine co-design. Sometimes people are brought in once most of the decisions have already been made and asked to then help make the program land, rather than shaping it from the outset. That can still be
susie915
Aug 314 min read


Strengthening connection between funding bodies and industry organisations
Agriculture has always had a strong foundation built on people, trust and shared knowledge. It is built on relationships between growers, industry bodies, researchers, government agencies, funding partners and the wider community. From my observations across Australian agriculture, unfortunately there can often be a disconnect develop between funding bodies and industry. In most cases, both are trying to achieve the same thing: a stronger, more resilient agricultural sector.
susie915
Aug 174 min read


Demonstrating the value and impact of agricultural programs
Understanding the true value and impact of agricultural and regional community programs is critical in determining the return on investment and in helping to shape future programs and investments. However, value and impact is not always easy to accurately measure and describe and is often not done as well as it could be. We can count attendance numbers, talk about outputs, collect feedback forms and write evaluation reports, and those things all have their place. But anyone w
susie915
Aug 175 min read


Why agricultural programs don't always meet expections
Through my career, I've helped to develop, deliver and oversee many different programs and projects to support agriculture. Some of them have been hugely impactful - creating real and meaningful change. I've also seen many that haven't really delivered to their potential. In this blog, I share my thoughts on what are the key things that make a difference in the performance of a program. Australian agriculture’s research, development, extension and capability-building system i
susie915
Jul 315 min read


Introduction
I have been giving a lot of thought as to what makes my services and what I offer unique and different. I unashamedly describe myself as a “generalist”, with a broad range of skills and experiences. I don’t have one unique area of specialty that I can claim as my own – rather, I am extremely capable in many areas. What makes this unique and special to me, is how I pull all those different skills and experiences together and draw on that knowledge to provide insight and work w
susie915
Jun 26, 20243 min read
bottom of page
